Denial of U.S. Passport

Your right to mobilize as a sovereign American

There is never a dull moment in the “Land of the Free” when it comes to the subject of the Federal Income Tax. Now the IRS is going after U.S. Passports to keep U.S. Taxpayers penned in.

WATCH our YouTube video on the CP508C process here.

The U.S. Congress consists of elected American Nationals who are supposed to look out after the best interests of the American People. Instead, they seem to work diligently to overthrow, obfuscate, or at least ignore the Constitution and its limitations placed against the National Government. Don’t forget that each politician has taken an Oath of Office “to protect and to defend” the Constitution which limits the government actions against American Nationals.

It appears that their collective memory undergoes a metamorphosis when they arrive in the foreign jurisdiction called the District of Columbia. Many times they pass ACTS of CONGRESS without even reading the act or notifying American Nationals what is contained in the bill, and they never identify the jurisdiction for the law. It would be simple for the U.S. Congress to state the legislation’s jurisdiction it is applicable within — but they decide instead to hide the truth!

To add insult, they have a ritual of inserting segments of non-related subjects to bills to mask a separate agenda. Doing so ensures the passage via the political maneuvering that most Americans are not even aware of, but they feel the impact after its passage. The FAST ACT is a clear example of this perpetual Machiavellian gamesmanship which is routine in Congress.

Most of the time, American Nationals see only the appearance that their elected federal officials are actually doing their job. Politicians, for the most part, give lip service about their promises and revert to serving the interests of those who make huge donations to their re-election fund, but in small segments so as to not draw attention.

Compared to the real work of American Nationals, they do little work each day as a majority of their time is focused on the next election and raising funds for it. Then they take vacations that most Americans would never have the time to take, because Americans are working so hard to pay their bills and pay a federal income tax they assume was levied upon all American Nationals.

Today, most American Nationals live in fear of their government’s bill collectors — the IRS — and they are unable to hire attorneys to educate them on what the law really says about the federal income tax. Sadly, most attorneys don’t even know about the lack of liability — or they pretend they don’t — regarding private-sector American Nationals not employed by the government.

The stated Mission of Weiss+Associates has been stated for years as:

“It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error, it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error.”
— American Communications Association v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382, 442 (1950)

American Nationals would do well to take this Supreme Court statement to heart, but if history is any guide, most will continue in their Rip Van Winkle slumber as the country goes the way of the Roman Empire.

This USSC task is a daunting one with the National Government operating out of control of ‘We The People.’ This Supreme Court statement illustrates that the Government bureaucrats and politicians will run wild if they are not brought under control by American Nationals. Those working in the Government have a huge propensity to err in their judgment and lose sight of their role in serving ‘We The People.’ Just watch any current Fox broadcast, and you will begin to see the massive problems caused by the sleeping sickness of the Rip Van Winkle syndrome of the American People. The End of America is close at hand if the trends are not reversed.

American Nationals have been converted into slaves or at least involuntary indentured financial servants of the National Government. Want proof? Just read 26 CFR § 1.871-1 (a) to see that the U.S. Congress has, under silence, converted American Nationals via their propaganda to make Americans think they are liable for the federal income tax when they are not. Remember, the U.S. Congress wrote this regulation and they are responsible for it.

The U.S. Congress states in this regulation that: “However, nonresident alien individuals may elect, under section 6013 (g) or (h), to be treated as U.S. residents for purposes of determining their income tax liability under Chapters 1, 5, and 24 of the code.”

One of their code words is “treated” which means “taxed” and Americans are taxed as U.S. Resident Aliens and not as American Nationals. “May elect” is only a voluntary act and imposes no duty or obligation!

Did you catch the obtuse phrase “Nonresident alien individuals”? That translates to mean American Nationals who live and work in the private sector, but they don’t want you to see the truth. So they cloak it in legalese terms to obfuscate what they have been doing for over seven decades. U.S. Resident Aliens are foreigners from other countries and as such are legitimate U.S. Taxpayers. They are some of the ones who must file and pay that tax. With most American Nationals having been converted into that which they are not, the question arises: “Who is the U.S. Constitution actually protecting?” “Does this meet the criteria of their Oath of Office?”

Most American Nationals have few financial resources to even take the Federal Officials, who violate their Oath of Office and their promises to serve ‘We The People,’ to court. Those in government positions know this all too well and, via the federal income tax, they strip away currency that might be used to bring litigation against a runaway government.

The latest fabrication — revocation or denial of a U.S. Passport by the FAST ACT from the U.S. Congress — was to compel American Nationals into submission to make payment(s) of an income tax they never lawfully owed. The USSC declared in the Pollock v. Farmer’s Loan & Trust Co., 157 U.S. 429 (1895) case was stated to be unconstitutional without the inclusion of the Rule of Apportionment per Article 1, Sections 2 & 9 in the U.S. Constitution. To compel American Nationals otherwise is also a violation of the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

There are those who are U.S. Taxpayers and those who are lawful Nontaxpayers. The latest attack is now being played against lawful Nontaxpayers to take their passports sans authority.

IRC 7345 was created to Revoke or Deny a U.S. Passport even against American Nationals presumed to be taxpayers. The statute fails to address the jurisdiction of taxpayers, via Subtitle F enforcement action, is only applicable within. Jurisdiction is vital and will always remain the key to understanding what the National Government [and the IRS] attempts to do.

The FAST ACT is supposed to deal with “Fixing America’s Surface Transportation” so what is the context for inclusion of the “revocation or denial of U.S. Passports” doing in this Bill as there is no correlation to the legislation. The answer is that they wanted to hide it so that Congress could pass the Bill without the opposition from 330 million Americans.

Here is what the FAST ACT created by the U.S. Congress states in part:

H.R.22 - FAST Act 114th Congress (2015-2016)
Sponsor: Rep. Davis, Rodney [R-IL-13] (Introduced 01/06/2015)
Committees: House - Ways and Means | Senate - Finance
Committee Reports: S. Rept. 114-3; H. Rept. 114-357 (Conference Report)
Latest Action: 12/04/2015 Became Public Law No: 114-94. (TXT | PDF) (All Actions)
Roll Call Votes: There have been 52 roll call votes

[[Page 129 STAT. 1312]]
Public Law 114-94 114th Congress
To authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes. NOTE: Dec. 4, 2015 - [H.R. 22]
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled:
(a) Short Title. — This Act may be cited as the “Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act” or the “FAST Act.”

Then there is this insertion into the FAST ACT – totally unrelated to the purpose of FAST ACT.

Subtitle A--Tax Provisions
Sec. 32101. Revocation or denial of passport in case of certain unpaid taxes.

So, the FAST ACT was entitled as a process proposed by the U.S. Congress to Fix America’s Surface Transportation. Typical, as with many bills created by the U.S. Congress, it represents the sneaky method to include a section related to Subtitle A Tax Provisions to take away the U.S. Passport of any American National presumed to have a tax debt greater than $51,000 USD.

It had to be buried in this act so that most Americans would never find it as they would if such an act was set up in a singular topic “seriously delinquent tax debt” in order for American Nationals to be aware of what the U.S. Congress was actually doing behind their backs. Funny thing about the FAST ACT… “Has there been any significant transportation improvement as a result of the FAST ACT?” A good question to ask before you vote again!

Now take a look at 26 CFR § 1.0-1 for the enactment of the IRC of 1954 and regulations, the predecessor for the IRC of 1986. You will find stated at 26 CFR § 1.0-1 (a):

“The Internal Revenue Code of 1954 which became law upon enactment of Public Law 591, 83rd Congress, approved August 16, 1954, provides in part as follows:”Then in (d) Enactment of Internal Revenue Title into law one finds the statement “In general, the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 are applicable with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1953, and ending after August 16, 1954.”

There is the clear presentment that the IRC of 1954 began on August 16, 1954 and it also ended after August 16, 1954 (and before August 17, 1954). Thus, the IRC of 1954 began and died on the very same day. Thus, it cannot be used within the Constitutional Republic.

“How does this affect the regulations for enforcement of the Subtitle A federal income tax?” At IRC 7851 (a)(6)(A) one reads the impact of all Subtitle F regulations as follows:

“The provisions of Subtitle F shall take effect on the day after the date of enactment of this title and shall be applicable with respect to any tax imposed by this title.”

The problem for the enforcement of IRC 7345 is that the IRC of 1954 died on August 16, 1954 and there can be no regulations for use toward American Nationals, working in the private sector, for liability of this tax or regulations as those regulations were to only go into effect on August 17, 1954 (the day after the date of enactment of the IRC of 1954). This is why jurisdiction is so important.

The U.S. Congress can do anything it likes to those statutory U.S. Citizens and U.S. Resident Aliens as they are U.S. Taxpayers. However, the same cannot be true in regard to American Nationals [read as Nonresident Aliens] who were born in the Constitutional Republic or naturalized therein. This is evident by the Federal Appellate Court Case of Long v. Rasmussen, 281 F. 236 (1922) as American Nationals [read as Nonresident Aliens] are neither of the subject nor of the object of the revenue laws promulgated in Title 26 USC.

Remember the regulation 26 CFR 1.871-1 (a) where it states that Nonresident Aliens may elect to be taxed as if they were U.S. Resident Aliens? Well, that procedure is restricted by the Federal Appellate Court and the U.S. Supreme Court against any lawful Nontaxpayer.

American Nationals should always be able to secure a U.S. Passport for international travel, as it is their right to travel unrestricted regardless of any purported “seriously delinquent tax debt” claimed by the National Government. The U.S. Congress who ‘passed’ this legislation should be held accountable and denied any retirement benefits for their violation of their Oath of Office. That would be a strong incentive to keep them in line, at least for a period of time.

The idea of a passport only arose to the U.S. Congress following World War I. It was a way of tracking people more than anything else. Today, U.S. Resident Aliens can only possess a Green Card. Statutory U.S. Citizens, those born in federal territories like Puerto Rico, can possess a U.S. Passport.

An additional question arises: “If American Nationals are now viewed by the U.S. Congress as being U.S. Resident Aliens, then how is it possible that a U.S. Resident Alien is in legal possession of a U.S. Passport with a birth location identified as being within the Constitutional Republic?”

If the Congress now taxes American Nationals, disregarding the USSC Pollock decision and the Legislative Intent of the 16th Amendment, by claiming an election devoid of any full disclosure, it will be interesting for Congress to “two-step” around an explanation as to how it is possible for U.S. Resident Aliens to have ever secured a ‘legal’ U.S. Passport.

To do that, the U.S. Congress would have to admit that they have evaded the restrictions against levying a direct income tax contrary to the U.S. Constitution, the USSC Pollock Decision, and the Legislative Intent of the 16th Amendment authored by former President Taft. The word “FRAUD” has a strong sound at this point, and it needs to be used by American Nationals against those politicians who did the damage to the Constitution and the American People.

Thus, the only targeted audience for IRC 7345 for issuance of a CP508C Certification of Revocation and Denial of a U.S. Passport, to be implemented by the U.S. State Department, can only apply toward this narrow group of statutory U.S. Citizens who are under the dominion and control of the National Government [read as the U.S. Congress]. American Nationals who live in the Constitutional Republic and work in the private sector are not to be included as stated by federal laws which have now been violated by those in the U.S. Congress.

The IRS must be compelled to issue a CP508R Certification of Reversal to the U.S. State Department for the prior CP508C Certification of Seriously Delinquent Tax Debt.

Those in government know they are violating the law but will only change if they are caught, prosecuted under 18 USC § 1589 Forced Labor for the (1) Serious Harm or threats of serious harm to American Nationals and (2) the Abuse or threatened abuse of law or legal process.

In subsection (c) one finds stated:

(c)In this section:
(1) The term “abuse or threatened abuse of law or legal process” means the use or threatened use of a law or legal process, whether administrative, civil, or criminal, in any manner or for any purpose for which the law was not designed, in order to exert pressure on another person to cause that person to take some action or refrain from taking some action.
(2) The term “serious harm” means any harm, whether physical or nonphysical, including psychological, financial, or reputational harm, that is sufficiently serious, under all the surrounding circumstances, to compel a reasonable person of the same background and in the same circumstances to perform or to continue performing labor or services in order to avoid incurring that harm.

It is about time to start legal proceedings against each member of Congress who instigated such malignant legislation to negatively impact the lives and well-being of the very people they were elected to serve.


We offer a service to help clarify your true and correct status as an American National and differentiate you from a statutory U.S. Citizen/U.S. Resident Alien/Taxpayer. Remember: This legislation can only be lawfully applied to statutory U.S. Citizens.

We offer a full 100% Money Back Guarantee that, if you have received a CP508C letter Certification of Revocation and Denial of a U.S. Passport, we will achieve a Court Order of Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction from the U.S. Tax Court. This is proof that you are NOT subject to the jurisdiction of the federal government, and it will lead to a CP508R. For proof of efficacy, here is a sample of a CP508R we helped achieve for an actual client through our correspondence effort with the U.S. Tax Court.

In order to qualify for this service (including any Money Back Guarantee), you MUST:

    1. be an American National, meaning that you truly identify as any of the following:
      • One who was born in one of the now 50 states of the Union
      • One who was born to parents, at least one of which was born in one of the 50 states
      • One who was naturalized into the Constitutional Republic
    2. NOT work for the U.S. National Government in any capacity
    3. NOT personally operate under the structure of a Legal Fiction
    4. NOT have filed a Form 1040 income tax return for the year(s) in question listed on the CP508C letter

It certainly would help if you have already successfully completed the Revocation of Election process, as this would make it easier to prove yourself as an American National and NOT a statutory U.S. Citizen liable for the federal income tax. If you’d like more information on the Revocation of Election process, please click here and watch the video here.

To get started, please email us a PDF file of the CP508C letter you received. The fee for this service is 5% of the total purported debt listed by the IRS. Once we verify your candidacy for this service, we will email you a PayPal invoice (we also accept – and welcome – cryptocurrency for payment.) Expect this process to take between 4-6 months from beginning to end, or receiving your Court Order for Lack of Jurisdiction. That court order can then be used to produce the CP508R, and in a few cases can take a few months longer.

The justification for the fee is derived from the fact that we offer a unique service that practically no one else offers, and we are guaranteeing the Lack of Jurisdiction result. Where else can you find that?

For further information on this passport service, please email us, and inform us if you need a brief phone call, including your phone number and convenient time to call (taking into account we are six hours ahead of U.S. Eastern time zone).

Our Mission

“It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error, it is the function of
the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error.”
— American Communications Association
v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382, 442 (1950)